March against Sharia or March against FGM?

Anti-Sharia March Has Good Intentions but Is Misnamed

On June 10 ACT for America will be conducting so-called “March against Sharia” events in some 20 states and 28 cities across America.  In the announcement on their webpage they state,

“We, at ACT for America, are committed to protecting women and children from Sharia Law and its impact on Muslim women and children including honor killing and Female Genital Mutilation. We must ensure that every woman and child enjoy the protection afforded by the U.S. Constitution.”

Muslim groups such as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) are taking a hard-line stance against the march stating that it will contribute to “the creation of the environment in which violence [against Muslims] feels permissible”.  Counter protests are being organized in several locations.

[Cue screeching tires soundtrack…] The stage has been set – and powerfully energized by numerous horrific hate incidents throughout the world – for potentially ugly confrontation.  But do the opposing sides even actually understand what the opposition is protesting?  Or do we have the Golden State Warriors attempting to play a championship game against the New England Patriots – different game and different playing field?

On the one side, ACT for America has called their protest a “March against Sharia”, when they are actually protesting abusive treatment of women and girls particularly in the forms of honor killing and female genital mutilation, neither of which are a part of Sharia law. 

Honor killing, as defined in Wikipedia.com, is “the homicide of a member of a family, due to the perpetrators’ belief that the victim has brought shame or dishonor upon the family, or has violated the principles of a community or a religion, usually for reasons such as refusing to enter an arranged marriage, being in a relationship that is disapproved by their family, having sex outside marriage, becoming the victim of rape, dressing in ways which are deemed inappropriate, engaging in non-heterosexual relations or renouncing a faith”.

The concept of honor killing has somewhat recently emerged in American consciousness due to the proliferation of several cell phone recordings of girls being stoned to death, and the recent murder of 25-year-old Pakistani social media star, Qandeel Baloch, who was killed by her brother for “bringing dishonor to the family”.

But were these the acts of psychopathic murderers, or devout Muslims, simply carrying out the teachings of the Quran and being obedient to Sharia law?  For the average American, their perception has been wholly shaped by the universal media portrayal of Muslim men as Middle Eastern terrorists and women as submissive and oppressed.  Certainly groups such as Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS exist as very real and terrifying archetypes of this image.  But these groups represent only a tiny fraction of the 1.8 billion Muslims of the world.

There is another group of Muslims, a very important group, that gets almost no media exposure, is almost never portrayed in action movies or TV dramas – the over 1.5 billion mainstream Muslims, including the over 3 million who live in the United States.  I’m talking about the surgeons and attorneys who live in our neighborhoods, and take their families to the mosque on Fridays.  Whose kids play on the same sports teams as our kids, and the ladies who are so readily identifiable because they wear the hijab in public.  Before we all go out and call our protest a “March against Sharia”, it’s important that we understand what Sharia means to mainstream Muslims, not what it means to deviant and murderous radicals.

To further emphasize this point, we must realize that that since June 1, while 8 were killed in London and one in Melbourne Australia, there were over 30 attacks by terrorists naming Islam as their religion against other Muslims, with deaths totaling well over 100.  Muslims are the targets of terror attacks to a much greater degree than those of us in the West, in the first week of June alone, by a factor of 10 to 1.  We must understand that these terror victims who are Muslims are also our allies against terror, and before we protest Sharia law in blanket fashion, perhaps we should take the time to gain an understanding of how mainstream Muslims view Sharia law.

Getting back to our question of whether honor killings are the acts of deviant psychopaths, or of devout Muslims following the basic teachings of Islam, our first source is the Quran itself.  Most people are surprised to find out that, of the more than 6000 verses encompassed by the Quran, a small percentage are directive, in the form of  specific commands, and, properly omitting the passages allowing killing in a defensive struggle, which relate to war, not civil law, “physical punishment was authorized just five times in the entire Quran”, and only addressed four crimes. 

The first crime addressed is murder (and other forms of violence), for which capital punishment is allowed (or a lesser physical punishment depending on the level of physical violence perpetrated).  In this case, if the perpetrator repents before he is apprehended, he may be forgiven.  This is found in the Quran 5:37-34.

The second crime addressed is stealing, and the punishment is for a cut to be placed on the wrist of the thief, presumably so that he would have been easily identified by merchants in the marketplace.  Naturally, extreme versions of Sharia take the most extreme interpretation, amputation of the hand. (Quran 5:38-39).

The third crime which allows physical punishment is that of adultery, and the punishment is 100 lashes for both the man and the woman who violate the marriage vows (Quran 24:2).  In present-day times, this is admittedly harsh and inappropriate, but when compared to the punishment prescribed in the Old Testament for adultery – stoning to death (Deuteronomy 22:22-25) – Mohammed’s punishment was much less severe.

The last crime in the list is falsely accusing someone of adultery, for which whipping is also prescribed as punishment.

To sum up, the Quran prescribes capital punishment for murder, as does US legal code, however the Quran allows forgiveness for repentance, while US legal code does not.  The use of physical punishment for lesser crimes, and the concept of lashes for violation of the marriage vows are problematic to be sure, but are by no means justification for honor killing.  The concept of honor killing is completely absent in the prophetic recitations of Mohammed as recorded in the Quran.  Neither the imams who teach in the mosques of mainstream Muslims, nor the rank-and-file Muslims who attend are promoting a kind of Sharia law that promotes honor killing.

So if ACT for America wants to March for human rights on behalf of women victims of honor killing, by all means do so, and I will march with you, but it is completely wrong to call the protest a “March against Sharia”.

In fact, the history books tell us that in pre-Islamic Arabia, female infanticide was commonly practiced, the child being buried alive the moment she was born.  It was Mohammed who strictly forbade this practice in the Muslim community (Quran 81:8-9, 17:31, 16:58-59), and who may be credited for its discontinuance.

Mohammed taught over and over again in opposition to any concept akin to honor killing. The vast majority of Mohammed’s directives involve pure–hearted devotion to a merciful God as reflected by a life of integrity, respecting one’s family, and over and over again, helping those in need.  The notion that Mohammed created a religion of violence is simply false.  When compared to the tribal culture of Arabia surrounding Mohammed, to the Christian Byzantine kingdom, in which torture was commonplace, and the Sassanid Persian Empire, Islam was truly revolutionary for its strict regulations against violence.

The Quran is actually full of directives related to matters of family law, mainly related to making sure that women were treated fairly in matters of property distribution in times of divorce and death.  This is why Muslim women favor Sharia law, to the incredulity of those of us in the West.

John Esposito and Dalia Mogahed, in their enlightening book, Who Speaks for Islam, point out that, when it came to honor killings, of those who committed them in the country of Jordan, 69% did not perform their daily prayers and 56% did not perform the fast of Ramadan.  In fact, many had histories of violent behavior: 35% had already served sentences for previous crimes, 32% were illiterate, only 4% had attended college and 24% were brought up in broken homes.  Clearly, something other than the teaching of Mohammed had driven these men to murder their own female relatives.

So, once more, please join ACT for America and march against the victimization of women in honor killings.  But the reference to Sharia must be dropped.  It doesn’t apply for over 1.5 billion mainstream Muslims, who favor a Sharia law that is primarily about social justice.  If so, I venture to say that many will join you.

Much more could be said, but we must move on to the subject of female genital mutilation (FGM).  It is somewhat understandable, given the woefully distorted media representation that we are all exposed to, that the average American could come to the conclusion that Sharia law demands honor killings.  But the assumption that FGM is a Muslim practice is a patent falsehood.  One need only consult the well referenced Wikipedia.com article on the subject to know that FGM originated in North Africa prior to the spread of Islam there, and was most widely practiced among primitive tribal groups throughout Central Africa.  It is practiced by Christian communities in Africa, in fact, 55% of Christian women and girls in Niger have experienced FGM, compared with only 2% of their Muslim counterparts.  There is no mention of it in the Quran, and in 2007, the Al-Azhar Supreme Council of Islamic Research in Cairo, one of the most highly respected institutions of Islamic scholarship, ruled that FGM had ”no basis in core Islamic law or any of its partial provisions”.

So in the case of FGM, even more so than for honor killings, it is at best an error of ignorance similar to targeting a turbaned Sikh thinking he is a Muslim, and at worst an overt misrepresentation.  By all means march.  March for the victims.  Stand with them and support them in every way.  This is a noble cause.  But the reference to Sharia must be removed as absolutely false.  The Act for America march on June 10 is a march for the rights of victimized women.  Understandably, the acts and practices of the extremist groups who claim to be practicing Islam are included as those being marched against.  But it must also be understood that these extremists do not represent mainstream Muslims, rather they target them as victims.  And their practices are against the teachings of the Quran – any of the Muslims you find around you will tell you this.

Once again, if the name of the march is changed to “March for Victims of Honor Killings and FGM” and the reference to Sharia is removed, Muslims will join the march.

To those Muslims who are participating in counter protests, I ask you to visit the website of the organizers to understand the true purpose of the march, and to see that they have disassociated themselves from the Arkansas march, which was hijacked by a white supremacist.  The constant reference to Sharia law, a concept of social justice that is integral to the practice of Islam, is upsetting and disturbing.  But please understand, or at least try to give the benefit of the doubt, that organizers and participants are wholly ignorant of even the existence of, let alone the teaching of mainstream Islam of nonviolence and social justice.  When the term Sharia is used, it refers to the practices of the Wahhabis, ISIS, and the Taliban.

If counter protests take place and battle lines are drawn, I fear that the result will be an escalation in tensions between Muslims and non-Muslims in the US, leading to even greater Islamophobia, and inevitably, more violence.  America needs education.  America has been immersed in completely false yet prolific images of Islam and is almost completely unaware of the teachings and practices of Islam’s mainstream.  America is unaware that the strongest force of Islam, its mainstream believers, is our most powerful ally in the struggle against radical terrorism.  Our ignorance will be overcome with patience, with peace, and with awareness.  I call upon my Muslim brothers and sisters at full moon during the month of Ramadan, to emulate the Prophet (peace be upon him) and to take the high road in the case of this wholly misnamed protest entitled “March against Sharia “.  May peace be upon us all.

 

References

  1. Sadakat Kadri, Heaven on Earth a Journey Through Shari’a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia to the Streets of the Modern Muslim World, New York, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2012
  2. John Esposito and Dalia Mogahed, Who Speaks for Islam, New York, Gallup Press, 2007
  3. http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/25/asia/pakistan-honor-killing-bill/index.html
  4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_killing
  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation

One thought on “March against Sharia or March against FGM?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *